Forums

In another article from USA Today, it seems as though Clinton has been receiving support from private corporations in return for promised funding. One of her most staunch critics are environmental activists, most notably Greenpeace, in which they are undoubtedly stating that Clinton has received more than $1 million dollars from these private corporations who work in the gas and oil industry that are vying to get her a seat in the White House. Greenpeace activist Eva Resnick-Day sarcastically thanked Clinton for supposedly ensuring the safety of the environment with the promise of tackling global warming and green house gases while also commenting whether she would be tackling such a feat with the help of fossil fuel money. At such a remark Clinton was enraged, unsuccessfully saying that this was not true and that whoever uttered it (supposedly Bernie Sanders) was a “liar.” Now this could all come as a surprise to whoever does not follow politics, but it has become a reality that these private corporations bid on the campaigners, gambling their profits with the promise of ten times the profit in return if they prove to be correct in their algorithms. This is of course illegal, as campaigns and campaigners are not allowed to accept any money from such corporations directly through them. However, it seems that these wealthy billionaires, who have been exploiting the Earth's natural resources and making immense profits, have been calling the shots since more than a hundred years ago. According to Frederick Jackson Turner, the land in America that was there before it was cultivated was to be destined to be used for resources. Cities and urban dwellings were bound to happen, and industrialization and the exploitation of nature was unavoidable. However, too much unrestraint would ultimately lead to manipulation, coercion and evil deeds. The effects of such events have echoed up to today, as it is clear that these corporations still have a hold on our society.

Like Brian has mentioned, because of Citizens United, I understand it is actually legal in the U.S. for corporations to donate money for federal campaigns because it is protected under their First Amendment rights. As absurd as it sounds corporations are qualified as persons ("corporate personhood") and are extended some of the same rights a natural person would be granted. As a Canadian, the concept is hard to grasp but America's politics are completely different. In Canada, the ideology behind socialism is much more acceptable than it is in the United States. They gravitate heavily towards capitalism and are mostly fall right wing on the political spectrum.
The reason that probably caused a ruckus between Clinton and Sanders is not because of it was illegal (because it is not) but because it does not seem honest or ethical especially considering the companies/organizations involved. Global warming is a topic that is continuously brought up and as more signs begin to show of its impending damage, this would be a key issue to bring about and use to one's advantage when improving their own image or trying to diminish the image of your opponent. As a democrat, Hillary Clinton definitely does not want to have her reputation marked on that matter.