Forums

Globalization includes the worldwide movement of people. Whether temporary or permanent, this global movement of citizens consists of countless stories and complexities which are the topic of a good percentage of global literature. Countries, and people arranged in unforgiving hierarchies, some poised to surge ahead while other groups will be forced behind.

All passports or rights associated with birth nationalities are not created equally.

If one’s birthright allows for extensive, visa-free global travel, it is easy to forget that this is not a right granted to many of the earth’s citizens. Cultural arrogance, as a result of many historical advantages, has often left a path of quiet suffering in its wake. Borders relentlessly rip families apart. This frequent wrenching of family ties is all too often the human story of globalization and is the topic of considerable global discussion. The current turmoil is related to the American executive order on immigration.

One of the countries caught in this ban(or attempted ban) is Iraq. Despite America’s agreement to share diplomatic and security ties, the American reliance on Iraqi forces in current conflicts, and 5000 American troops in Iraq, America has suspended traveling rights for Iraqis. Gordon and Schmitt's recent New York Times article, "Trump’s Immigration Order Jolts Iraqis, U.S.’s Top Allies Against ISIS. " outlines some of the issues with this nationalized othering. This decision ignores the American need for air bases in the Middle East, cultural expertise, and previous agreements. Cultural arrogance has left Iraqis stranded and maligned because of their nation of origin. This version of nationality has been repeated throughout history, damaging relationships and crushing the personal realities that fall on the wrong side of invisible barriers.

I think this is a very important point to be making. I think that it's due time most of the world came to realize that cultural diversity is one of the fastest growing qualities all around the globe, especially in North-America. We've essentially come to a stand-still in this age of international relations and policies in which we have a choice to welcome a sort of mass-migration which will bring with it diverse societies made up of differing cultures and practices. I think the act of putting up these metaphorical (and literal) walls of fear to seclude those living in America is not only detrimental to the idea of human rights but also to the general pursuit of knowledge and higher learning. I'm essentially drawing on points made from a columnist named Peter Marina and you can read his full article here http://lacrossetribune.com/news/opinion/editorial/columnists/peter-marina-diversity-makes-us-better/article_936ccc0f-a293-5b3f-af4f-4d6155393b66.html

It's a simple point he's trying to make and that's that diversity makes the community and country that welcome's it far better off than a nation that sticks to one way of looking at things.

He makes note of doctors who fail to diagnose patients due to lack of knowledge about certain medical explanations based on ethnic background. He also goes on to mention how white police officers might feel like they are perceived as racist if made to patrol a community that is home to a higher percentage of black citizens.

Essentially all of these misconceptions are detrimental to the fate of a country. As a student I think this forward thinking and embracing of cultural diversity is especially important. Taking a class in Indigenous studies should not mean that I should be met with criticism for not being of Native descent, nor does taking a Women's Studies class mean that I necessarily HAVE to be a woman. Instead we should all welcome this diversity in which we can all learn from one another and create for ourselves the knowledge and the tools to better our surroundings.

I agree with my classmates who believe that, as the article suggests, cultural arrogance is a growing problem within today's society and i also think that this is an theme that is represented in many of the texts that we have studied this semester, most notably Conrad's Heart of Darkness and Achebe's Things Fall Apart.
We as a society in North America are very reliant on our global ties for economical and trade purposes but also as allies in fighting greater global causes, and thus it would make sense for us to endorse rather then to reject globalist attitudes. This idea, like so much of what we have been discussing this semester seems especially relevant because of the Trump situation and the current relationships that the U.S has with other countries around the world. Trump commits cultural arrogance frequently, most notably with his travel ban blocking people primarily of Muslim origin from entering the U.S.
As I mentioned above, cultural arrogance is depicted through Conrad and Achebe's works as they both depict the forced European colonization of Africa, an endeavor that had extensive and prolonged negative effects on non-European countries as they essentially took all they could form these countries (in the form of goods and resources) and then left them with nothing in exchange.
I think that it is clear through the article as well as the novels we have studied and through the examples of my fellow classmates that cultural ignorance has only negative effects, which makes me question where we are headed as it is a problem that seems to be repeated within society over and over again.